Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Ayodhya and my view

First of all congratulations for beautifully pouring out your heart. Its a good work.

What you have written is absolute correct on lines of modern thinking for sake of true civilization.
So,
1. Any personal property's(here the mosque) fate should only be decided thru constitutional methods.
2. Even if there are disputes, parties should go to law which should be sole body to decide based on facts and scientific cum human angles.
3. On human grounds no one should be forced to accept any thing against his or her will which is in turn not trespassing other's personal dominion.

In your blog, you have given a feel for:
1. Raam didn't proved in existence.
2. All forces entangled directly/indirectly in 1992 demolition act, involved for politcal advantages.
3. The act was taken under a false expectations and wrong faith without any acceptance and without any authenticity.
4. Only there are wrongs done by hindus which is a religion very shallow or having more negatives than positives in a perspective of pure civilization.
5. Ignorance is always a bliss.

What i would like to point you out here , with my own reading about India, cultures, other religions, history, modern philosphy, human rights and essence of human life, is as follows:
1. As faith is a force leading to self belief and sustainence. Faith like imagination cannot be measured and generalized as true or lie. No one knows what can be the outcome of it when balmed to your mind, heart and soul. Raam may exist or may not, but no modern thinker in glory of his/her intellect can deny that millions have enlightened themselves with His name, with full compliances with highest moral values. Unrealistic capabilties do creep in with faith. Raam has been a naive object of faith for many believers who are secular in all their behaviour and have been away from all human caprices surrounding the socio-economic scenes around.
2. Like you who think of present any time and also of only those who appeared on television, without turning leaves where lots of for and against are written, there are many who got involved with the Ayodhya Ram temple movements without any external factors.
Before giving strong and deeply impacting comments(which may create wrong notions), we must first find well backed truth that everybody involved were only trying for political mileage.
3. One drawback that has always eaten into our indian national intellectual minds is not looking into self-esteem as the essence of all knowledge before going for salvation. This creates disintegration, inequality and uneven-ness in thoughts and opinions. People at same time under-value or deplore one thing but forget to think over other aspects which equaly qualify for similar measurements.

What i am saying here is:
1. why only you dragged VHP, BJP, hindus in courtroom. They appeared on national television thats why.
2. Why aren't you equivocal in criticism of those from other parties who have undertaken tyranny throughout the history everyday for last hundreds of years behaving very low on moral values, even today they are doing this. 
3. Why are you not imploring those acts which are happening in pakistan, bagladesh and kashmir and are against indian 5000 yrs of secular traditions.
4. Why didnot you deplore destruction of temples across subcontinent(including India) when only one mosque has been destroyed in Ayodhya.
5. The said parties didn't exactly do for what you described here as political mileage but more so as reactionary, ego-driven and self-assertion despite secular traditions here.
6. Check first that which is bad, lowly looking politics or well planned destructive ideological undercurrents( which is more political inside despite all innocent showups).
7. India has been a laboratory of deep philosphies, secular traditions and faith. Try to find out why some forces of these traditions have become reactionary.
Try to see other faces of coin(not only mean politics as you say).
8. What if the other ideologies, even if you provide a niche to them, have their highest religious philosophy saying that other religions are meant to be only subjugated or annihilated.
9. When you go through the Indian philosophical texts of centuries and text from religions coming from outside India, only Indian theories will qualify for modern education yet we dont include them in fear of so called secularism and try to settle with something diplomatic kind of secularism.

Coward acts of communalism in India has to be suppressed/punished no denying but who will change the course of cowardice among intellectuals.
Every ignorance is not a bliss. India has been burning more because of this. 

Try to see more with your heart,hence forth find and speak the truth.

I am writing from heart and mind. I have so many things to say. Space and time dont permit.